Issues faced by LGBTIQ+ individuals in Lebanon
The members of the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Intersex and Questioning (LGBTIQ+) community in Lebanon are particularly vulnerable as they lack protection support and face discrimination on the grounds of their sexual orientation and/or gender identity (SOGIE).
These individuals can be legally prosecuted for consensual homosexual relations between adults, according to article 534 of the Criminal code of Lebanon, which reads: “any sexual intercourse contrary to the order of nature is punishable by imprisonment for up to one year”. The vaguely worded article has and is still being used to crackdown on the LGBTIQ+ community in Lebanon.
As a practical matter, enforcement of the law is varied and often occurs through occasional police arrests.
While Lebanon remains far from an LGBTIQ+-friendly country, activists have been able to log a few wins. In particular, four landmark rulings in 2009, 2014, 2016, 2017 and in March 2019, set important legal precedents in the fight to abolish Article 534. The judges in these cases acquitted defendants charged under 534, arguing that conceptions of nature are socio-cultural constructs, making it impossible to designate any behavior categorically unnatural. The LGBTIQ+ community is present in all regions of Lebanon (such as North Lebanon: Tripoli, East Lebanon: Zahle), but because of fear of arrest, and other safety related risks, they tend to stay out of sight and without any support from NGOs since most of these organizations work primarily in Beirut.
As noted in “The LGBTIQ+ community in Lebanon, documenting stories of torture & abuse” report by Proud Lebanon, LGBTIQ+ individuals suffer more from psychological disorders than heterosexual individuals (Kuyper & Fokema, 2011).[1]
In addition to above mentioned, LGBTIQ+ individuals face discrimination whilst seeking sexual health examinations and treatment. As a result, in a report published in 2016 the National AIDS Program (NAP) reports that out of 5000 individuals participating in a UN monitored study, 27.5% of men having sex with men (MSM) were HIV positive, while in the 2015, the National AIDS Program (NAP) reported 113 new cases of HIV/AIDS Lebanon. 86% of them were MSM (males having sex with males) individuals[2]. The LGBTIQ+ community is one of the most vulnerable groups at risk of infectious sexual diseases in Lebanon, as many are too afraid to go for a test or seek treatment for HIV or other STIs because of the discrimination they might face, a fear of disclosure to an employer or family, and a lack of awareness of safer sex or even due to financial obstacles.
Proud Lebanon is one of the NAP’s partners and provides Voluntary Counselling and Testing (VCT) tests, and was the first organisation to host Support+ an HIV support group dedicated for youth in the LGBTIQ+ community.
Proud Lebanon provides follow up through Support+ to the newly diagnosed HIV individuals and although the HIV rapid testing and medication are available and provided for free by the NAP, patients have to pay for viral load and CD4 tests every 6 months as well as the medical check-ups undergone by the Infectious diseases specialists (IDS). Therefore, individuals with low income and refugees cannot access vital screening test to see if they are responding to antiretroviral therapy (ART) – an essential need for those living with HIV as well as to follow up with specialists.
Access to various services to some of the most vulnerable groups is limited and often quite expensive and/or inaccessible. This includes access to specialised treatment for people living with HIV, access to medical support for people with sexually transmitted infections (STIs), access to Psycho-medical and other services for LGBTIQ+ individuals, etc. Finally, the public’s knowledge on issues related to LGBTIQ+ rights, STIs, HIV and other issues is not sufficient and often leads to stigmatization and discrimination against these populations.
As outlined in a needs assessment conducted by Proud Lebanon, LGBTIQ+ individuals in Lebanon still have very limited access to medical, legal and psychological support as only 9% of interviewees stated that they have been provided with legal support (even though more than 80% stated that they need it).[3]